The Impact of Corruption Distance on Ownership Strategies of Spanish and Portuguese MNEs

Mariana Pedrosa Faria, Fernando Carvalho, Nuno Rosa Reis

Abstract


The ownership strategy of foreign subsidiaries is an important decision for multinational enterprises (MNEs). Previous research has analyzed the effect of country dimensions on this strategy, both from the home and the host country. In this paper we delve into the effect of differences between home and host country on the MNEs’ ownership strategies. Empirically, we analyze the influence of corruption distance on the ownership strategies of Spanish and Portuguese MNEs, using data from 3,941 foreign subsidiaries. We found that the higher the absolute corruption distance between Spain (or Portugal) and the host country, the higher the ownership controlled by MNEs. However, when the host is more corrupt than the home country, MNEs have a lower ownership level in the local subsidiaries.

 

 


Keywords


Corruption Distance; Ownership Strategy; Home-Host Differences; Portugal; Spain.

References


Anderson, C., & Tverdova, Y. (2003). Corruption, political allegiances, and attitudes toward government in contemporary democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 47(1): 91-109.

Anderson, E., & Gatignon, H. (1986). Modes of foreign entry: A transaction cost analysis and propositions. Journal of international business studies, 17(3): 1-26.

Barkema, H., & Vermeulen, F. (1998). International expansion through start-up or acquisition: A learning perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1): 7-26.

Beamish, P. (1985). The characteristics of joint ventures in developed and developing countries. Columbia Journal of World Business, 20(3): 13-19.

Bellos, S., & Subasat, T. (2012). Corruption and foreign direct investment: A panel gravity model approach. Bulletin of Economic Research, 64(4): 565-574.

Brada, J., Drabek, Z., & Perez, M. (2012). The effect of home-country and host-country corruption on foreign direct investment. Review of Development Economics, 16(4): 640-663.

Canabal, A., & White, G. (2008). Entry mode research: Past and future. International Business Review, 17(3): 267-284.

Chari, M., & Chang, K. (2009). Determinants of the share of equity sought in cross-border acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(8): 1277-1297.

Cheung, S. (1996). A simplistic general equilibrium theory of corruption. Contemporary Economic Policy, 14(3): 1-5.

Contractor, F., Lahiri, S., Elango, B., & Kundu, S. (2014). Institutional, cultural and industry related determinants of ownership choices in emerging market FDI acquisitions. International Business Review, 23(5): 931-941.

Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2006). Who cares about corruption? Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6): 807-822.

Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2008). Better the devil you don't know: Types of corruption and FDI in transition economies. Journal of International Management, 14(1): 12-27.

Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2016). Corruption in international business. Journal of World Business, 51(1): 35-49.

Cuervo-Cazurra, A., & Genc, M. (2008). Transforming disadvantages into advantages: developing-country MNEs in the least developed countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(6): 957-979.

Cuervo-Cazurra, A., & Genc, M. (2011). Obligating, pressuring, and supporting dimensions of the environment and the non‐market advantages of developing‐country multinational companies. Journal of Management Studies, 48(2): 441-455.

Di Guardo, M., Marrocu, E., & Paci, R. (2016). The effect of local corruption on ownership strategy in cross-border mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Business Research, 69(10): 4225-4241.

Duanmu, J-L. (2011). The effect of corruption distance and market orientation on the ownership choice of MNEs: evidence from China. Journal of International Management, 17(2): 162-174.

Eden, L., & Miller, S. (2004). Distance matters: Liability of foreignness, institutional distance and ownership strategy. In Godinez Hitt, M. & Cheng, J. (eds.) The Evolving Theory of the Multinational Firm. Volume 16, pp. 187-221, Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Ferreira, M., Vicente, S., Borini, F., & Almeida, M. (2017). Degree of equity ownership in cross-border acquisitions of Brazilian firms by multinationals: a strategic response to institutional distance. Revista de Administração, 52(1): 59-69.

Gabbioneta, C., Greenwood, R., Mazzola, P., & Minoja, M. (2013). The influence of the institutional context on corporate illegality. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38(6): 484-504.

Gaur, A., & Lu, J. (2007). Ownership strategies and survival of foreign subsidiaries: Impacts of institutional distance and experience. Journal of Management, 33(1): 84-110.

Globerman, S., & Shapiro, D. (2003). Governance infrastructure and US foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(1): 19-39.

Godinez, J., & Liu, L. (2015). Corruption distance and FDI flows into Latin America. International Business Review, 24(1): 33-42.

Gupta, S., & Abed, G. (2002). Governance, corruption, and economic performance. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.

Habib, M., & Zurawicki, L. (2002). Corruption and foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(2): 291-307.

Hernández, V., & Jesús Nieto, M. (2015). The effect of the magnitude and direction of institutional distance on the choice of international entry modes. Journal of World Business, 50(1): 122-132.

Holmes Jr, R., Miller, T., Hitt, M., & Salmador, M. (2013). The interrelationships among informal institutions, formal institutions, and inward foreign direct investment. Journal of Management, 39(2): 531-566.

Karhunen, P., & Ledyaeva, S. (2012). Corruption distance, anti-corruption laws and international ownership strategies in Russia. Journal of International Management, 18(2), 196-208.

Lambsdorff, J. (2003). How corruption affects persistent capital flows. Economics of Governance, 4(3): 229-243.

Luo, Y. (2001). Equity sharing in international joint ventures: An empirical analysis of strategic and environmental determinants. Journal of International Management, 7(1): 31-58.

Madhok, A. (1997). Cost, value and foreign market entry mode: The transaction and the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18(1); 39-61.

Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3): 681-712.

Neu, D., Everett, J., Rahaman, A., & Martinez, D. (2013). Accounting and networks of corruption. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38(6): 505-524.

O’Brien, R. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, 41(5): 673-690.

OECD. (2014). The rationale for fighting corruption. Paris: OECD.

Pajunen, K. (2008). Institutions and inflows of foreign direct investment: A fuzzy-set analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(4): 652-669.

Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1993). Corruption. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 599-617.

Slangen, A., & van Tulder, R. (2009). Cultural distance, political risk, or governance quality? Towards a more accurate conceptualization and measurement of external uncertainty in foreign entry mode research. International Business Review, 18(3): 276-291.

Smarzynska, B., & Wei, S-J. (2000). Corruption and composition of foreign direct investment: Firm-level evidence. NBER Working Paper w7969. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Stopford, J., & Wells Jr, L. (1972). Managing the multinational enterprise: organization of the firm and ownership of the subsidiary. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3): 571-610.

Svensson, J. (2005). Eight questions about corruption. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(3): 19-42.

Tekin-Koru, A. (2006). Corruption and the ownership composition of the multinational firm at the time of entry: Evidence from Turkey. Journal of Economics and Finance, 30(2): 251-269.

Uhlenbruck, K., Rodriguez, P., Doh, J., & Eden, L. (2006). The impact of corruption on entry strategy: Evidence from telecommunication projects in emerging economies. Organization Science, 17(3): 402-414.

Voyer, P., & Beamish, P. (2004). The effect of corruption on Japanese foreign direct investment. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(3): 211-224.

Wang, Y., & Larimo, J. (2018). Ownership strategy and subsidiary survival in foreign acquisitions: The moderating effects of experience, cultural distance, and host country development. In: Verbeke, A., Puck , J. & van Tulder, R. (Eds.). Distance in international business: concept, cost and value. volume 12, pp. 157-182, Bingley: Emerald Publishing.

Wei, S-J. (2000a). How taxing is corruption on international investors?. Review of Economics and Statistics, 82(1): 1-11.

Wei, S-J. (2000b). Local corruption and global capital flows. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 31(2): 303-354.


Full Text: PDF/INGLÊS (Português (Brasil))

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Iberoamerican Journal of Strategic Management  e-ISSN: 2176-0756

Licença Creative Commons
Este obra está licenciado com uma Licença
Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0 Internacional