Mitigating Negative Aspects of Mimetic Isomorphism in Retail

Marcelo Carvalho, Daniela Menezes Garzaro, Otávio Bandeira de Lamônica Freiree, André Torres Urdan

Abstract


Objective: Our main purpose with this technical report was to propose actions for a retail shoe trade that result in equalization among the varieties of products offered, stock level and invested capital.

Method: It is a qualitative research conducted using the strategy of a case study in a small footwear retail in São Paulo.

Relevance: We examined isomorphic characteristics in a small footwear retail trade, illustrate management details in the industry, and propose actions to improve the business.

Results: We found evidences about the main problems in store management: excess of variety of products offered, a high level of inventory and a high value in the capital invested.

Theoretical / methodological Contributions: With this report we highlighted the main problems observed in the management actions of a small shoe retail store in São Paulo, and offered an alternative to the current management model.



Keywords


Shoes retail; Mimetic isomorphism; Paradox of choice; Management.

References


Amor-Esteban, V., Galindo-Villardón, M. P., & García-Sánchez, I. M. (2018). Industry mimetic isomorphism and sustainable development based on the X-STATIS and HJ-biplot methods. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(26), 26192-26208.

Assis, L. B., Andrade, J. O., Neto, A. C., Tanure, B., & Carrieri, A. (2010). O Isomorfismo entre executivos nas maiores empresas brasileiras. Gerais: Revista Interinstitucional de Psicologia, 3(1), 95–107.

Associação Brasileira de Empresas de Componentes para Couro, Calçados e Artefatos. (2015). O varejo calçadista do Brasil visto de perto. Recuperado em 10 maio, 2017, de http://www.assintecal.org.br/noticia/o-varejo-calcadista-do-brasil-visto-de-perto

Ballou, R. H. (2001). Gerenciamento da cadeia de suprimentos. planejamento, organização e logística empresarial. (4 ed.) São Paulo: Bookman.

Bertaglia, P. R. (2017). Logística e gerenciamento da cadeia de abastecimento. Editora Saraiva.

Biancolino, C. A., Kniess, C. terezinha, Maccari, E. A., & Rabechini Jr, R. (2012). Protoloco para elaboração de relatos de produção técnica. Revista de Gestão E Projetos - GeP, 3(2), 294–307.

Bowerson, D.J., Closs, D.J., Cooper, M.B., & Bowerson, J. C. (2014). Gestão logística da cadeia de suprimentos. (4 ed.). Porto Alegre: Bookman.

Cachon, G. P., & Kök, A. G. (2007). Category management and coordination in retail assortment planning in the presence of basket shopping consumers. Management Science, 53(6), 934-951.

Chan, C. O., Liu, O., & Szeto, R. (2017). Developing information sharing model using cloud computing and smart devices for SMEs supply chain: A case in fashion retail. International Journal of Information Systems and Supply Chain Management (IJISSCM), 10(3), 44-64.

Creswell, J. W. (2010). Projeto de pesquisa: métodos quantitativos, qualitativos e misto (3 ed.). Porto Alegre: Artmed.

Dar-Nimrod, I., Rawn, C. D., Lehman, D. R., & Schwartz, B. (2009). The maximization paradox: The costs of seeking alternatives. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(5-6), 631-635.

Dias, M. A. P. (2011). Administração de materiais: princípios, conceitos e gestão (6 ed.). São Paulo: Atlas.

DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amercican Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.

Fasolo, B., Carmeci, F. A., & Misuraca, R. (2009). The effect of choice complexity on perception of time spent choosing: when choice takes longer but feels shorter. Psychology & Marketing, 26(3), 213–228.

Fasolo, B., Hertwig, R., & Huber, M. (2009). What is the difference that makes the difference between small and large real-world assortments? Psychology & Marketing, 26(3), 254–279.

Flamand, T., Ghoniem, A., Haouari, M., & Maddah, B. (2018). Integrated assortment planning and store-wide shelf space allocation: An optimization-based approach. Omega, 81, 134-149.

Fisher, M., & Rajaram, K. (2000). Accurate Retail Testing of Fashion Merchandise: Methodology and Application. Marketing Science, 19(3), 266–278.

Haynes, G. A. (2009). Testing the boundaries of the choice overload phenomenon: the effect of number of options and time pressure on decision difficulty and satisfaction. Psychology & Marketing, 26(3), 204–212.

Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (2003). Fundamentos de marketing. Pearson Education.

Macedo, M. A. da S., & Almeida, K. de. (2011). Análise envoltória de dados em decisões de localização. Revista de Administração FACES Journal, 10(4), 17–40.

Patil, R., Avittathur, B., & Shah, J. (2010). Supply chain strategies based on recourse model for very short life cycle products. International Journal of Production Economics, 128(1), 3-10.

Reutskaja, E., & Hogarth, R. (2009). Satisfaction in choice as a function of the number of alternatives: when “goods satiate”. Psychology & Marketing, 26(3), 197-203.

Riley, J. M., Sweeney, K., Venkataraman, S., & Klein, R. (2018). How inventory management systems mistreat retail project quantity items and other bimodally distributed products. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 28(3), 277-293.

Schwartz, B. (2005). The paradox of choice: why more is less. (HaperCollins, Ed.). New York.

Seaman, B. (2018). Considerations of a retail forecasting practitioner. International Journal of Forecasting.

Spinelli, P. B., & Giraldi, J. M. E. (2004). Análise teórica e empírica da imagem de loja e da marca própria varejista: implicações estratégicas. Caderno de Pesquisas em Administração, 11(4), 59-73.

Sudharshan, D., Furrer, O., & Arakoni, R. A. (2015). Robust imitation strategies. Managerial and Decision Economics, 36(3), 139-157.


Full Text: PDF (Português (Brasil))

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Iberoamerican Journal of Strategic Management  e-ISSN: 2176-0756

Licença Creative Commons
Este obra está licenciado com uma Licença
Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0 Internacional